“We are not created equal in every way” by Joan Rayn

Nature or nurture? This question has baffled scientists and human beings in general for a long time. The logical answer is twain. It might seem simple, but looking closer at almost every situation shows that both play a key role in the outcome. Joan Rayn (2000) introduces her article We are not created equal in every way with a similar situation. The write logically argues that institutions have the right to have certain admission standards, she also brings up a few preserves regarding the students. Although missing unity and sufficient evidence, Ryan brings about a logical argument.In we are not created equal in every way, Joan Rayn (2000) upholds the right of institutions in setting admission standards, however she presents a pressing concern for current students. Firstly the author asserts that we are not created equal, therefore institutions need standards of admission to increase their chances of success. Moreover she discusses a major problem that might follow to young adu lts. Since certain institutions require a young age to admit students, parents have to decide for their children.Several parents have the tendency to be living their dreams through their children. It is outstanding for a writer to stick to one subject. If not the reader will be confused, his concentrationtorn to bits, and the author will loose credibility. Those are the effects of Rayns lack of unity in her article. She begins with the question in paragraph three with Does the San Francisco Ballet School have the right to give preference to leaner body types later she proposes another topic by saying But for me, the more disturbing issue in this story isnt about weight but age. furthermore Rayn fails to provide evidence for her claim in paragraph five when she says But most who practice the art disagree, which is their right. For these two reasons Rayn does not seem apt or copeledgeable about the subject at hand, Joan Rayn reaches a logical conclusion about institutions having s pecific criterion to accept students, on the other hand, more or less of the issues concerning the children seem extraneous. She mentions that selecting 300 students from this years 1400 applicants. When faced with scarcity the best usually have the pleasure of getting what they want.That is how it has always been, natures way. In contrast Rayns concerns about parents having full control over their childrens decision is unsound for two reasons. First, at a young age parents know their children more than they know themselves and should be making their decisions for them. The second point is most people dont know what they want to do for the rest of their lives. So even if parents decide to live their lives through their children when they are old enough they will choose their own path.